Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 00:21

Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Need a different reason to eat more fiber? How about microplastics? - The Seattle Times
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
A high-resolution spectrometer that fits into smartphones - Phys.org
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Scoop: WhatsApp banned on House staffers' devices - Axios
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Chinese EV Makers Pull Away From Tesla With Sales Gains - Barron's
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Nintendo Switch 2: The Ars Technica review - Ars Technica
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
What’s a mistake most guys make when trying to get a girlfriend?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
What happens to adults with Down syndrome when their parents can't look after them any more?
Thank you.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
What’s next?